Artificial Intelligence (AI)

CPME Rapporteur: Prof. Dr Christian LOVIS (CH)
CPME Secretariat: Ms Sara RODA

CPME monitors the developments and the implementation of the Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA), and advocated in the Digital Omnibus on AI to maintain AI used for medical purposes in the scope of application of the AIA’s requirements for high-risk devices.

The uptake of AI in healthcare is still low due to several factors, including the complex environment of the sector, the wide range of products available on the market, the majority of which are not certified by a third-party, and a lack of confidence in using AI systems based on data from unknown data sources or data collection processes. 

AI products should be seamlessly integrated into the healthcare information system and reflect the real needs of healthcare professionals, patients and their carers. Doctors should be free to decide whether to use an AI system, bearing in mind the best interests of the patient, and to retain the right to disagree with an AI system,without repercussions.

CPME supports applying the strict liability regime for AI systems (as there is no need for the victim to prove fault) and mandatory insurance for high-risk AI systems, which should include “tail” cover.

CPME welcomes the AIA risk-based approach, the development of the EU database for high-risk AI and the risk management system. The list of stand-alone high-risk AI of Annex III should include the use of AI for assessing medical treatments and for health research. Certain systems cannot be deployed without clear validation as there can be misuse leading to discrimination and harm.

Providers of AI systems should designate an AI officer to ensure internal compliance of companies with the AI Act, in particular when processing special categories of data for bias detection and correction, or for producing AI outputs, or for disclosing or making personal data available to third parties.

Human oversight must be of ‘high quality’ and the provider is appropriately resourced for the effective performance of the task. The CE marking should only be given to AI systems that comply with EU law, including the General Data Protection Regulation. The possibility of exercising data subject rights must be provided in the AI system from the very beginning.

Featured Policies

Feb 2026 CPME 2026/003
Feedback to Digital Omnibus Package
Calling for credibility of digital regulations in Europe.
Download
Nov 2024 CPME 2024/073 FINAL
Deployment of AI in healthcare: Sector-specific challenges and accelerators
The policy provides recommendations to improve the uptake of AI in healthcare, with a focus on clinical decision-making AI systems.
Download

Other Policies

Jul 2026 CPME 2026/111 FINAL
Joint Open letter AI Act must regulate AI-embedded medical devices
CPME, BEUC, HOPE, EHAP, CDT and ANEC call on co-legislators to defend the integrity of the AI Act and to reject any attempt to erode its horizontal character or diminish the existing level of patient and consumer protection.
Download
Apr 2026 Info 2026/096 FINAL
Open Joint Letter on Digital Omnibus on AI
Civil society calls to preserve the scope and Integrity of the AI Act
Download
Mar 2026 CPME 2026/052
CPME-HOPE Open Letter for safe transparent and accountable AI for medical devices
Doctors and hospitals and healthcare services call on EU legislators to maintain medical devices (MD) and in vitro medical devices (IVMD) within the scope of the AI Act, and to apply the requirements for high-risk AI systems set out in Chapter III, Section 2 of the AI Act.
Download
Jul 2025 CPME 2025/152
CPME response targeted consultation on classification of AI systems as high-risk
The responses to this consultation paper will provide important input to the Commission when preparing the guidelines.
Download
Feb 2024 CPME 2024/017 FINAL
Response to Council of Europe’s questionnaire on AI
Report on the impact of AI on the ‘patient-doctor’ relationship
Download
Dec 2021 CPME 2021/134 FINAL
CPME Response Public Consultation Civil Liability on AI
CPME supports applying the strict liability regime for AI systems (as there is no need for the victim to prove fault) and mandatory insurance for high-risk AI systems, which should include "tail" cover.
Download
This website uses cookies for personalization to allow video functionality. More information our privacy policy.
Necessary cookies to provide the basic functionality of this website.
Cookies of 3rd party providers: YouTube